Submit Email Comments Opposing the Northern Turnpike Connector Toll Road
This Action Alert orignially asked FNPS members to attend a meeting of the Northern Turnpike Connector Task Force that was scheduled for March 25 in Ocala. That meeting has been postponed indefinitely in reponse to Coronavirus concerns and directives for us all to self-isolate. While this eliminates the opportuinty to comment directly to members of the Task Force on the 25th, it doesn't preclude the submission of written comments via email to FDOT.Listens@dot.state.fl.us . Please take this opportunity to quickly and easily (and safely and conveniently) share your concerns about this destructive and unnecessary proposed toll road. Additional information and details are provided below:
If you aren’t familiar with the project, you can review the basics in a report we published in the Sabal minor (https://www.fnps.org/assets/pdf/sabalminor/issue_6_november_december_2019.pdf) or at the M-CORES website (https://floridamcores.com/northern-turnpike-connector-task-force/). We have provided some possible talking points below. The impacts of a project like the Northern Turnpike Connector M-CORES toll road would be so massive and broad in scope, they extend far beyond our FNPS mission to speak for native plant conservation. Since you cannot comment in person to the Task Force, comment by email to FDOT.Listens@dot.state.fl.us . Comment on something specific you care about. Public sentiment is against the roads based on comments expressed at previous meetings and it appears to be resonating with some Task Force members. Share your most serious concerns, and let them know if you live in the area and would be affected directly.
The Florida Native Plant Society is continuing to assess the potential impacts of the M-CORES projects on native plants and other sensitive natural resources. FDOT has released a “Draft Avoidance Areas Map that identifies conservation lands the road would not impact. You can download the map, and other documents describing the project, at https://floridamcores.com/event/northern-turnpike-connector-task-force-meeting-4/#documents. If there is a natural area in the Study Area that is special to you, it may well be in the crosshairs of the future highway and the development it is intended to promote. A list of possible talking points is provided below. If you share our concerns, or have others of your own as a potentially affected resident, please take the time to submit comments.
Consider the following:
- Nearly 1.2 million acres of protected conservation land, and more than 158,000 acres of land in already-approved Florida Forever projects, is located in the Northern Turnpike Connector Study Area, underscoring the immense conservation value of this region.
- Agriculture’s contribution to our economy is second only to tourism. The Northern Turnpike Connector Study Area encompasses a huge swath of Florida’s agricultural land base, including commercial forests and ranchland that are indispensable to maintaining connectivity among existing conservation lands in the region. Some of those privately owned forests and ranches have been proposed for protection as approved Florida Forever projects and more than 28,000 acres are approved for protection as Rural and Family Lands Program projects,
- More than half of the 2.5 million acre Study Area consists of fire-dependent plant community or fire-maintained agricultural land. A major highway bisecting the length of the region would compromise huge investments in land conservation, and productivity in affected ranches, forests and cropland, by reducing the long-term ability to conduct essential prescribed burns. Imperiled species and natural communities, and economically valuable agricultural, could suffer to accommodate a road that does not satisfy any identified transportation need – even if they have already been “conserved’ through public investment.
- Claims that the roads would bring important infrastructure, like high speed internet, to isolated rural areas and help address hurricane evacuation needs are questionable. High speed internet and other utilities could be extended to rural areas without investing billions on unneeded roads, and Florida’s Department of Emergency Management prefers improved evacuation planning that would allow evacuees to remain close to home as a safer and more cost-effective solution than building new roads.
- The Florida Department of Transportation’s systematic approach to planning for our transportation future has not identified a need for these roads, which could cost more than $30 billion to build – not including right-of-way acquisition! Current data from the Turnpike Authority indicates toll receipts would not come anywhere close to covering debt service on the bonds required to finance a project of this scale. Which transportation projects already vetted on the basis of need and available funding will be shelved to free up funding for M-CORES roads? Which other pressing needs will go unaddressed? Siphoning billions from FDOT’s budget to study and build unnecessary toll roads would require painful – and unnecessary! - tradeoffs.
- Our utter dependence on roads and the internal combustion engine to meet most of our transportation needs requires a paradigm shift that recognizes the reality of climate change. We must invest in the infrastructure of the future. The transportation network of the future will be different, and a toll road like the Northern Turnpike Connector would be antiquated before construction is even completed.
- FNPS has adopted a formal policy on the development of transportation infrastructure, and M-CORES does not meet the basic premise that new roads must be justified by a valid transportation need. See the full text of the policy, which may provide you with additional points to consider, at https://www.fnps.org/assets/pdf/pubs/policy_transportation.pdf.
Bottom line: moving forward with the M-CORES Northern Turnpike Connector project would require the expenditure of billions on a toll road that would not meet any real transportation need in the name of promoting economic development. Millions of acres of natural greenspace and agricultural land are at risk from the M-CORES projects. Projects of this scale need to be the subject of careful deliberation, yet even a cursory assessment raises profound doubts about the need for, and wisdom of, such a road. Please take the time to submit comments to FDOT and the Task Force members at FDOT.Listens@dot.state.fl.us .
Raise an Issue
Types of Issues Addressed by FNPS
- General areas considered to be of statewide FNPS significance
- Any Florida legislative action that affects our state environmental land acquisition program known as Florida Forever, which includes Florida Communities Trust and/or any other state agency funded through Florida Forever (DEP). This includes, but is not limited to, any legislation affecting funding of the program. It also includes the urgent need to fund the Florida Forever program.
- All state and local land acquisition efforts for preservation and conservation.
- Any statewide policy changes that enhance improve or further natural resource system protection within recognized preserves and/or reserve or state park refuge.
- Development issues that are regional or have statewide significance in that they affect a change in Florida policy towards land acquisition, natural resource systems or waters of the state, but only if the issue clearly relates to the FNPS mission to preserve, conserve and restore native plants and native plant communities.
- Any state legislative, state agency or state university action that would affect the viability (or lack thereof) of native plants and native plant communities. This includes, but is not limited to, state policy on exotic invasive species, water conservation, listed plant species, and cataloging of native plant communities.
General areas considered not to be of statewide significance include
- Issues that are primarily related to managing the way a local jurisdiction grows or the methods it uses to plan growth. Unless it can be shown to meet criteria number four in the previous section.
- Issues that are primarily transportation related unless the issue is of at least regional significance and would impact an established preserve/reserve/state park refuge/or a functional ecologically sensitive ecosystem.
- Issues that involve local jurisdictional ordinances or land development codes.